I am still very interested in the incident involving the “lost” nuclear warheads which traveled from North Dakota’s Minot AFB to Louisiana’s Barksdale AFB on August 30th. I have been following the incident in the news and on the net ever since.
While I was researching some reports that several Air Force people at Minot and Barksdale AFB’s, who had some connection to the incident, have (coincidentally) died in accidents over the past week or so, I happened upon an article which took a whole different slant on the event.
The author, Chuck Simpson, did such a good job of laying out his argument that I’m not going to rehash all the details here in my blog. However, I strongly encourage you to read his article for yourself. It is intelligent and very well written. You can read it at: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread302187/pg1
The article is titled:
Barksdale Missile Number Six: The Stolen Nuclear Weapon
In the article Simpson offers some very educational insights about how nuclear weapons are customarily handled by the US military. The facts, once presented, make it very easy to see that the reported scenario of how the incident allegedly went down--the official explanation which is being offered to the public, is highly unusual and even suspect. Simpson is lead to a very disturbing hypothesis about the so-called “B-52 bomber and nukes mistake.” In his summation he states:
“Six nuclear weapons disappeared from Minot AFB in North Dakota.
Five nuclear weapons were discovered at Barksdale AFB in Louisiana.
Which leads to my chilling conclusion:
Someone, operating under a special chain of command within the United States Air Force, just stole a nuclear weapon.”
At first glance, the number discrepancy (5 vs 6 warheads) seems a casual, even minor detail -- the error could be attributed to media misreporting or any number of mundane reasons. But when this discrepancy is viewed in context, when it is added to the large list of other discrepancies related to the incident, then it becomes significant. Further, it becomes more than just another small thread woven in a bigger cloak of misinformation and misdirection, it becomes sinister.
While I was researching some reports that several Air Force people at Minot and Barksdale AFB’s, who had some connection to the incident, have (coincidentally) died in accidents over the past week or so, I happened upon an article which took a whole different slant on the event.
The author, Chuck Simpson, did such a good job of laying out his argument that I’m not going to rehash all the details here in my blog. However, I strongly encourage you to read his article for yourself. It is intelligent and very well written. You can read it at: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread302187/pg1
The article is titled:
Barksdale Missile Number Six: The Stolen Nuclear Weapon
In the article Simpson offers some very educational insights about how nuclear weapons are customarily handled by the US military. The facts, once presented, make it very easy to see that the reported scenario of how the incident allegedly went down--the official explanation which is being offered to the public, is highly unusual and even suspect. Simpson is lead to a very disturbing hypothesis about the so-called “B-52 bomber and nukes mistake.” In his summation he states:
“Six nuclear weapons disappeared from Minot AFB in North Dakota.
Five nuclear weapons were discovered at Barksdale AFB in Louisiana.
Which leads to my chilling conclusion:
Someone, operating under a special chain of command within the United States Air Force, just stole a nuclear weapon.”
At first glance, the number discrepancy (5 vs 6 warheads) seems a casual, even minor detail -- the error could be attributed to media misreporting or any number of mundane reasons. But when this discrepancy is viewed in context, when it is added to the large list of other discrepancies related to the incident, then it becomes significant. Further, it becomes more than just another small thread woven in a bigger cloak of misinformation and misdirection, it becomes sinister.
No comments:
Post a Comment